LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 9032
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#98389
Complete Question Explanation

Flaw in the Reasoning. The correct answer choice is (B).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice.

Answer choice (C):

Answer choice (D):

Answer choice (E):

This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
User avatar
 winter19
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Dec 02, 2024
|
#113282
I picked up two flaws in this stimulus: (1) the obvious mistaken reversal and (2) the student goes from talking about a general group-- those who view [art] to a specific group -- those in art circles

Frustratingly, both were present in the answer choices. (B) described the mistaken reversal so I picked it, but (C) described the second flaw. A "member of a class" are those who view art whereas a "atypical instance of that class" would be those who are in art circles, who can be expected to have a different reaction than a general viewer of art.

How should I have chosen when it seemed like two flaws were being described by the answer choices?
User avatar
 Dana D
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 446
  • Joined: Feb 06, 2024
|
#113295
Hey Winter,

The flaw described in answer choice (C) is not present in the stimulus because there are not two classes being described here. "Those who view art" is not a separate class, the stimulus is saying anyone who lays eyes on these types of great works of art will have a passionate response. In this way, the author is setting up the viewing of the art as a sufficient condition which will will be accompanied by a passionate response. Being in a art circle might be a class, but more likely in this context it indicates that these are people who look at art (and therefore meet the sufficient condition of viewing the art).

But I see how this could be a close call between answer choices, so to address your second question of what to do when you think you see two flaws: try addressing the flaw and see if the stimulus still has issues. So here, let's correct the flaw in answer choice (C) and re-write the stimulus to say "Thus, since it is well known by those who view art that the provocative work..."

If we make the two groups the same - both times talking about people who view art - is the flaw in the stimulus now rectified?

No.

We still have the issue identified in answer choice (B) - the flaw of mistaking a necesary condition as sufficient. Therefore, the actual flaw in this stimulus can't be coming from answer choice (C), it's coming from answer choice (B).

hope that helps!
User avatar
 winter19
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Dec 02, 2024
|
#113321
Addressing one flaw to see if the stimulus still has issues is so helpful, I don't know why I didn't think of it in the moment. Thank you so much

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.