- Thu Jul 24, 2025 10:28 am
#113702
Hi Dancing,
While credibility is mentioned earlier in the passage (lines 20-25), that discussion is not directly related to the discussion of "cognitive framework" (line 58) cited in this question.
Wrong answers in reading comprehension often mix two or more words/ideas that appear in the passage to state an idea that was not actually stated in the passage, as Answer E does here. These answers can be tempting to test takers who don't read the passage and the answers very carefully because they sound similar to ideas that were mentioned in the passage.
One of the best ways to avoid being tempted by these wrong answers is to prephrase your answer before you look at the answer choices. In this question, for example, it would be unlikely that your prephrase would include the idea of credibility since this wasn't mentioned anywhere in this paragraph.
In answering questions regarding why the author discussed/mentioned a certain idea, you should "zoom out" and consider what the purpose of the entire paragraph was. This paragraph discusses how positively framing negative information can be effective, but also shows a limitation on how this strategy could backfire if the negative information is too damaging.
The specific discussion of "cognitive framework" relates to how juries will filter the remaining information in the trial based on their initial view of the case (either positive or negative). A good prephrase would get at that idea, and that idea is best captured in Answer A.