- Wed Feb 10, 2021 3:20 pm
#83978
Answer E weakens the argument by contradicting one of the premises, Leon. One resident complained that the recreation center is necessary, and that closing it is therefore unacceptable, but answer E is saying that resident may be wrong, as the necessity for a recreation center is declining. So perhaps closing the rec center could be acceptable!
In a Weaken-EXCEPT question it is common for some of the answers to attack the premises, because without the premises to hold up the conclusion, the conclusion isn't very strong.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam