LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8219
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#27457
Complete Question Explanation

Assumption—CE. The correct answer choice is (B)

The conclusion in the stimulus is that schizophrenia is caused by damage to the physical structure of the brain. This is concluded based on the discovery that people with genetically identical brains showed a physical difference when one of the two had schizophrenia. Since we are looking for an assumption, we need to find an answer that would eliminate something that could severely weaken this argument (in this case, the possibility that the cause and effect are reversed).

Answer choice (A): The argument is not about the overall size of the brain, but only about specific portions and their relationship to schizophrenia.

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. As mentioned above, this answer eliminates the possibility that the cause (smaller portion of brain) could actually be the result of the effect (schizophrenia).

Answer choice (C): The comparison in the stimulus is between identical twins, so assumptions about their brains relative to the brains of others is irrelevant.

Answer choice (D): Again, the stimulus is discussing the comparison between one twin with schizophrenia and the other without, so both twins having (or not) schizophrenia is not relevant to the argument.

Answer choice (E): Since we are only concerned about the relationship between the size of a specific portion of the brain and schizophrenia, the frequency with which identical twins get schizophrenia is not important to the argument.
 saygracealways
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: Apr 09, 2020
|
#74973
Hi PowerScore,

The conclusion in the stimulus says "damage to the physical structure of the brain" caused schizophrenia (effect).

Your explanation says that (B) eliminates the possibility that the C and E relationship are reversed (meaning it eliminates the possibility that schizophrenia :arrow: smaller brain). I'm a bit confused to how this relationship is reversed because the stimulus says "damage to the physical structure of the brain"? Can we assume that "damage to the physical structure of the brain" is synonymous to "smaller brain"?

Thank you :)
User avatar
 KelseyWoods
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1080
  • Joined: Jun 26, 2013
|
#74987
Hi saygracealways!

The premise in the stimulus tells us that "when only one of a pair of identical twins is schizophrenic, certain areas of the affected twin's brains are smaller than corresponding areas of the unaffected twin." So the stimulus has already equated "smaller brain areas" with "damage to the physical structure of the brain" for us. The argument is concluding that damage to the physical structure of the brain (signified by smaller brain areas) causes schizophrenia.

Hope this helps!

Best,
Kelsey

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.