LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 gabyd33
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Jan 15, 2022
|
#95154
Hi PowerScore,

After reading the passage analysis in the RC Bible and the question explanation, I still don't understand how a reader is meant to conclude that the main point of this passage is about the use of natural predators to control agricultural pests, instead of the predator-prey relationship between cyclamen mites and Typhlodromus mites. Aside from references in lines 1-3 and 34-37, there is no allusion to a greater point. If the example is the whole passage, how is a reader supposed to realize that the main point is not about the example. In other words, what did I miss that I should have been looking out for?

Thanks in advance!
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#95179
Hi Gaby,

Did you mean to post this is a different question thread? Number 23 is not about the main point, but is about the potential alternate experiment.

Overall, this passage is using the mites as an example of a larger point. It starts off by telling us the main point---the use of natural predators can be a highly effective means of pest control. The passage continues by stating that the mites are an example of the process that the passage introduced. You can think of the main point of the passage here as a frame---it's not explicitly and repeatedly called to in every part of the passage, but it's framing the information presented. The author is clear that this isn't JUST a story of mites, but instead a broader point about pests and predators.

Hope that helps
 mollylynch
  • Posts: 62
  • Joined: Jul 21, 2023
|
#103257
Hi,

Where is the support for A in the passage?
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#103384
Hi Molly,

The support is in the last two paragraphs of the passage. When the Typhlodromus mite is eliminated/harmed by the parathion, the cyclamen mites flourish because they have no predator to keep their numbers in check. But if there were a pesticide that attacked the cyclamen instead of the Typhlodromus mites, they would both have a predator AND a pesticide lowering their numbers. We wouldn't know what would happen with the Typhlodromus mites, but we can be confident that the cyclamen would decrease in population.

Hope that helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.