LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8917
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#40012
Complete Question Explanation
(The complete setup for this game can be found here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=12912)

The correct answer choice is (B)

This is one of the most challenging question in this game, requiring us to identify an answer choice containing a list of variables that cannot all be assigned to Thorne. Without the use of templates, we would have no choice but to plug-and-chug the variables from each answer choice in the hopes of determining which combination does not work. A far superior approach would be to validate the four incorrect answer choices by referring to the relevant templates.

Answer choice (A) is incorrect, because F, G, H, and M can all be assigned to Thorne in Template 1.

Answer choice (B) is the correct answer choice, as none of the templates have a provision where the assignment of variables to T Thorne includes F, H, K, and M. If these four variables were assigned to Thorne, we would be forced to assign G and L to Silva in order to satisfy the minimum requirement of two variables per group. This, however, would violate the third rule of the game:
PT74 - Game_#4_#22_diagram 1.png
Answer choice (C) is incorrect, because G, K and L could comprise a complete assignment of variables to Thorne, as suggested by Template 2A.

Answer choice (D) is incorrect, because G, K and M could comprise a complete assignment of variables to Thorne, as suggested by Template 2A.

Answer choice (E) is incorrect, because K and M could comprise a complete assignment of variables to Thorne, as suggested by Template 2A.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 LustingFor!L
  • Posts: 80
  • Joined: Aug 27, 2016
|
#31712
I removed E as a contender because in problem 18 I had the following scenario:

S: FHL
T: KM

Please advise how it is the correct answer.
 Kristina Moen
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 230
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2016
|
#31882
Hi,

The question asks "Which one of the following CANNOT be the complete assignment of photographers to the Thorne University ceremony?" so you were right to remove answer choice (E) as a contender. It is not the correct answer. Good job using your previous work. I won't say the correct answer here, so you have an opportunity to go back and try the question again! :)
 oops27
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: Sep 05, 2017
|
#39237
I thought this game was partially-defined, moving; unbalanced/overloaded.

Set up like so, with S/T as bases.

FGHKLM^6

-- --

-- --
S T


F (vertical
H block)

If L+M, then different ceremonies.

If G(s), then L(t)....contrapositive L(t)slash, then G(s) slash.

K(t)slash, then H(t) + M (t)...contrapositive H(t) or M(t) both slash, then K (t)

I don't understand how answer choice e is the correct answer. Why couldn't you put the FH block in Silva and the KM block in Thorne?...don't have either L or M, so that rule doesn't apply...the second rule (G and L) doesn't seem to apply...finally, in this hypothetical, H is not in Thorne, so K is in T. Since we only need one OR the other to activate the 3rd rule; why can't KM go in Thorne together? Also, what would you change about this setup? Thanks powerscore!
 Francis O'Rourke
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 471
  • Joined: Mar 10, 2017
|
#39286
Hi oops,

The correct answer to this question, # 22, was answer choice (B)

Above, Kristina commented that it was correct to "remove answer choice (E) as a contender." Let me know if you have any other questions for this one :-D
 theamazingrace
  • Posts: 59
  • Joined: Oct 17, 2020
|
#81515
Is another reason why B cannot be a complete assignment because K, M and H can not all be together because of rule 3?

Thanks
User avatar
 KelseyWoods
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1079
  • Joined: Jun 26, 2013
|
#84020
Hi theamazingrace!

That last rule doesn't say that K H & M cannot all be together. It only tells us what happens if K is NOT assigned to Thorne. But if K is assigned to Thorne, then that rule doesn't get triggered and it would still be perfectly fine for H & M to also be in Thorne. It's the other rules that end up making this impossible. But taken by itself, the last rule would still allow K H & M to be together in Thorne. The rule only tells us that they would not be able to be together in Silva.

Look at the diagram and contrapositive of that rule:

Kt :arrow: Ht + Mt
Ht or Mt :arrow: Kt

Whenever you have a set of contrapositives, you cannot have the two sufficient conditions at the same time. However it's totally fine to have the two necessary conditions at the same time. Ht Mt & Kt are all necessary conditions and, thus, they could all be true simultaneously.

Hope this helps!

Best,
Kelsey

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.