LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5852
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#67427
Complete Question Explanation

Weaken-CE. The correct answer choice is (B)

The stimulus indicates that experience ("learning how to build a nest") plays a role breeding success. That statement is then followed by an example, and examples on the LSAT are typically used to illustrate premises of the argument. In this case, Dr. Snow finds that blackbirds nesting for the first time are less successful than older birds, and less successful then even they are a year later.

The author then rejects two possible causes—size and strength—and concludes that nesting experience is the cause of success in breeding.

Answer choice (A): The argument does not seek to compare different bird breeds, but is instead about is about success over time. Thus, this information does not help us undermine the argument.

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. This answer suggests that experience is not the cause, but rather a physical ability or maturity within the birds that is allowing for greater success. Since this suggests an alternate cause, this is the correct answer.

Answer choices (C): This answer supports the idea that experience plays a role, and thus this answer strengthens the argument.

Answer choice (D): If this is the case, then experience could still be the cause, and consequently this answer does not weaken the argument.

Answer choice (E): This answer addresses information about the birds before they even start nesting, which means it is about a situation that occurs before the causal relationship being discussed. Answers such as these (or those about what happens after the relationship) are typically incorrect.
 cmorris32
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: May 05, 2020
|
#75846
Hi PowerScore!

I identified B as the correct answer, but I am struggling to understand why A does not introduce an alternate cause. I feel like when I read answer choice A, I thought that Blackbirds' ability to build better nests provides an alternate cause as to their nesting experience. Can you please explain?

Thanks!
Caroline :-D
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5153
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#76227
We aren't looking for what causes their nesting experience, Caroline, nor are we looking to compare blackbirds to other birds. We are looking to see what causes them to have increased breeding success over time. The author thinks nesting experience is the cause - the more experienced they become at building nests, the more they succeed at breeding. Answer A tells us nothing about why they get better at breeding over time. And building a better nest than another bird doesn't mean that they do or do not improve at nest building over time. They might start out better than all other birds, and continue to improve from there. Answer A is just irrelevant to the causal argument about breeding success.
 cmorris32
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: May 05, 2020
|
#76228
Adam Tyson wrote:We aren't looking for what causes their nesting experience, Caroline, nor are we looking to compare blackbirds to other birds. We are looking to see what causes them to have increased breeding success over time. The author thinks nesting experience is the cause - the more experienced they become at building nests, the more they succeed at breeding. Answer A tells us nothing about why they get better at breeding over time. And building a better nest than another bird doesn't mean that they do or do not improve at nest building over time. They might start out better than all other birds, and continue to improve from there. Answer A is just irrelevant to the causal argument about breeding success.
Thank you for answering so many of my questions, Adam! I really appreciate it.
 TZHUUMD22
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: Jun 06, 2020
|
#76690
Hello PowerScore,

So the point here is that "capacity to breed," by virtue of it "increases with each successive trial (meaning breeding?) during the first few years of reproduction" is independent from "experience to nest," am I correct?

Thanks a lot!

T
User avatar
 KelseyWoods
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1079
  • Joined: Jun 26, 2013
|
#76764
Hi TZHUUMD22!

Let's start by breaking down this argument:

Premise: Older birds are more successful at breeding than first time nesters (Observation)
Premise: Size and strength cannot be the cause of why older birds are more successful at breeding because blackbirds are fully grown when they leave the nest. (Rejecting some possible causes of the observation)
Conclusion: Experience in nest building causes success in breeding (Concluding this is the only potential cause of the observation that remains)

On the LSAT, we always accept the premises as true. In a Weaken question, we want to show that the premises given do not necessarily prove the conclusion stated.

In this argument, we accept that older birds are more successful in breeding. We need to attack the author's explanation for this observation--nesting experience. To do that, we need to find another possible explanation for the observation that older birds are more successful in breeding besides nesting (and size and strength, since these were also already discounted in the premises).

Answer choice (B) tells us that the ability of blackbirds to lay viable eggs also increases over their first few years of reproduction. This suggests that the cause of blackbirds increase in breeding success over time may have more to do with their reproductive systems continuing to mature, rather than their ability to build a nest.

So, yes, "capacity to lay viable eggs" is different than "nesting experience" (which is more specifically described as "learning how to build a nest" in the first sentence of the stimulus).

Hope this helps!

Best,
Kelsey

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.