- Wed Jun 09, 2021 9:55 am
#87726
I am a little confused about the differentiation between slowing deforestation and stopping. I understand the biologist to be claiming that deforestation couldn't continue at the same rate but the politician to say that the only way to save the koala was to stop deforestation. I selected D because I thought it showed another possibility for saving the koala without "stopping" deforestation (ie. slowing it) which would be inconsistent with the politician's statement but could be consistent with the biologist's (the koala did not approach extinction and the forest did not continue to disappear at the present pace). Is there a different way I should be approaching this question or the wording?
Thank you in advance!
Thank you in advance!