LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1080
  • Joined: Jun 26, 2013
Hi Yournoona!

The argument in the stimulus is basically that Arnold holds a belief that is not based on any rational evidence, but is understandably based on emotional trauma that he experienced as a child, so therefore his irrational belief is justified.

Answer choice (C) matches this argument because, as in the stimulus, Joan has a belief that is not based on any rational evidence, but rather on past emotional trauma, and the author concludes that therefore her belief is justified.

Answer choice (E) does not match this argument because Sumaiya's belief that Anthony lacks the drive to be a successful pianist is not based on her past emotional trauma, but rather on her first-hand knowledge and experience of what it takes to make a career as a musician. Her belief is evidence-based rather than a based in emotional trauma, so it does not match the argument above with Arnold.

Hope this helps!

  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: Mar 13, 2020
Yes, it does. Thankyou so much for your hardwork.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.