LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8917
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#23956
Complete Question Explanation

Flaw in the Reasoning. The correct answer choice is (B)

The argument in the stimulus goes as follows:
  • Premise: ..... The environmentalists who oppose Golden Lake have opposed objections to most development proposals in recent years.

    Conclusion: ..... These people therefore must be anti-development and anti-progress, and their claim should be dismissed without consideration.
Answer choice (A): Taking lack of proof as if it were sufficient to disprove is a logical flaw, but not applicable to the argument in this case.

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. The author makes a Source argument, criticizing the environmentalists’ motives rather than addressing the merits of their argument.

Answer choice (C): This answer is incorrect. There may indeed be a trend in voting, and their opposition in this case may not be the exception to the rule.

Answer choice (D): The evidence in this case might be misinterpreted, but it is not necessarily misrepresented.

Answer choice (E): The author makes no reference to, or assumptions about, the individuals in the group. The argument is based on a critique of the group in general.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.