LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8919
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#81331
Complete Question Explanation

Flaw in the Reasoning. The correct answer choice is (E).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B):

Answer choice (C):

Answer choice (D):

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice.

This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
User avatar
 Agyeiwa
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Aug 28, 2023
|
#102961
Why is E the correct answer please?
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 722
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#102971
Hi Agyeiwa!

To see why (E) is correct, plugging in material from the stimulus can be helpful in giving the answer some traction and grounding.

The flaw, according to (E), is that the stimulus uses "the lack of evidence contradicting a claim [the claim is that food irradiation is safe] as conclusive evidence for that claim [that food irradiation is safe]." And this is indeed what the stimulus does. The author notes that a particular group of scientists "discovered no evidence challenging its [food irradiation's] safety." The author then concludes that this provides "certain proof that food irradiation is a safe practice."

This reasoning is flawed. For example, perhaps that particular group of scientists isn't representative of scientists as a whole, or is biased, or hasn't done thorough enough research into the effects of food irradiation. Just because they didn't find evidence, that doesn't mean such evidence doesn't exist. Or perhaps such evidence doesn't yet exist but might be established by some future study. In short, the group not finding evidence challenging the safety of food irradiation is not "certain proof" that it is safe.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.