LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#27577
Complete Question Explanation

Weaken. The correct answer choice is (D)

Here the author begins by saying that certain shifty-looking behaviors are not reliable indicators of lies. A better clue, says the author, comes from involuntary behaviors such as pupil dilation and small muscle movements in the face.

One problem with the author’s better approach, of course, is that such involuntary behaviors might not just result from lying; it’s possible that other factors might cause the same reactions—this is probably a good prephrase for the right answer to this Weaken question.

Answer choice (A): This choice does not weaken the author’s argument. If anything this choice might strengthen the assertion that involuntary responses are better indicators of lying.

Answer choice (B): This is irrelevant to the discussion of determining whether a given statement is the truth or a lie.

Answer choice (C): This choice strengthens the case for involuntary responses as more reliable indicators, so this cannot be the right answer to this Weaken question.

Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice, and the one that matches the prephrase from the discussion above: A truthful person might have the same responses brought about by other factors.

Answer choice (E): The author discusses voluntary versus involuntary responses as indicators of truth versus lies, so this choice, which provides that some liars display both, does not weaken the author’s argument.
User avatar
 Snomen
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: Sep 30, 2021
|
#90890
Hey, where is the conclusion ? Can someone please break down the Argument into Premises and conclusion?
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1787
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#90898
Snomen,

The conclusion is what the research indicates: behavior that cannot be controlled is a better clue when the lie is important to the liar. The last sentence gives the reasons why that's true, and makes it apparent that the "better clues" have only been shown to be good clues for emotional arousal, distress, fear, or anger. Those aren't necessarily good clues for lying, which is why the argument isn't perfect. The first sentence of the stimulus doesn't really seem to be particularly relevant to this weaken question.

Robert Carroll

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.