LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#85145
Complete Question Explanation

Parallel Reasoning—Sufficient and Necessary. The correct answer choice is (C).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B):

Answer choice (C): This is the correct answer choice.

Answer choice (D):

Answer choice (E):

This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
User avatar
 relona
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: Jul 23, 2021
|
#91070
To make sure I am understanding this right. When I saw this, I thought that it was a flawed argument because it used circular reasoning. With that said, I chose (A) because I believed to also use circular reasoning. I can see why (C) is correct, I am wondering why (A) is incorrect?

Thanks!

-relona
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5153
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#91212
I saw it the same way, relona! Although if we accept the conditional premise, we have to accept the conclusion since it is a contrapositive, so perhaps it's not truly a circular flaw? Either way, to parallel the argument we must select an answer that is based on a contrapositive of a conditional statement, and that is where answer A fails. The evidence is about Sawyer being available and negotiations being deferred, while the conclusion changes terms to talk about taking matters seriously and Sawyer being the negotiator.

Answer C is based on a contrapositive, which makes it parallel to the structure and reasoning of the stimulus. They threw in that bit about detractors just to make it less attractive, but the underlying reasoning is still the same.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.