LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 collegen98
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Jun 05, 2022
|
#96405
Could someone please review my work on this one?

First sentence:
LoA or QJ --> OF

Second sentence:
~TFO --> Allow LoA
TFO --> ~Allow LoA

We have to prove the conclusion (third sentence): QJ --> TFO.

We end up with the chain QJ --> TFO --> ~Allow LoA.
the contrapositive is Allow Loa --> ~TFO --> ~QJ.

And we know from the first sentence that Ann has to either quit her job or take a leave of absence, so in the contrapositive we see that by allowing the leave of absence and her not quitting, we know that she will take the leave of absence because she has to do the other of the 2 options, which corresponds to answer choice (D).

I'm a little iffy about whether I explained that last part properly. Thank you!
User avatar
 atierney
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 215
  • Joined: Jul 06, 2021
|
#96483
Hello,

Yes! You explained it perfectly! We know that she must do one of the two options, and so when Tony finding out prevents one of the options, she must necessarily do the latter. Let me know if you have any questions on this.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.