LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#85206
Complete Question Explanation

Strengthen—Principle. The correct answer choice is (C).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B):

Answer choice (C): This is the correct answer choice.

Answer choice (D):

Answer choice (E):

This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
User avatar
 LeslyLSATinLA
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Jan 30, 2023
|
#99392
i thought the correct answer wasn't as a strong enough as answer choice B, which to me was essentially saying the same thing because fanaticism is connected to the murdering of people. Though I'm still having a hard time understanding why C is the correct answer.
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1787
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#99414
LeslyLSATinLA,

The conclusion of the argument is the last sentence. Note that the argument never defined "murder". It is certainly not clear to me that causing the death of a person is always murder - legally that's not true, but commonsensically I think we can agree as well. Accidental deaths aren't murder. So the stimulus thinks certainly people were murderers, but never allows me to know when something counts as murder. It would be good if an answer choice would provide an appropriate definition, because that would then allow us to conclude (or at least, conclude with some more certainty than before) that some ordinary people of Q were murderers.

Only answer choice (C) actually does that. In fact, it shows that people doing exactly what some ordinary people of Q did are guilty of murder. That's what we want, so it's certainly a strong contender at this point.

Answer choice (B) doesn't define murder, but I think it's even worse - answer choice (B) says that the pursuit of paradise justifies fanaticism. Then...those ordinary people of Q were justified in their fanaticism, at the very least. Isn't that nearly opposite of the conclusion, which wants them to be morally culpable for their actions, not justified?

Robert Carroll

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.