LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#74173
Complete Question Explanation

StrengthenX—CE. The correct answer choice is (B)

The conclusion of the argument reflects a causal relationship, one where the likelihood of the effect
occurring is increased (indicated by the phrase “increased incidence”):

..... MBTE = MBTE used
..... II = increased incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath

..... ..... ..... C ..... ..... E
..... ..... ..... MBTE :arrow: II

The question stem is a StrengthenX, and therefore the four wrong answers will support the argument.
With a stimulus containing causal reasoning and a StrengthenX question, expect to see wrong
answers that come from the five different “Causality and Strengthen Questions” categories to help
the argument.

Answer choice (A): This answer shows that when the cause is not present, then the effect is not
present. Thus, the answer strengthens the argument and is incorrect.

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer. By indicating that the symptoms discussed in the
stimulus can be the effects of several potentially serious public health threats, the author offers up
possible alternate causes for the symptoms. These alternate causes would weaken the argument, and
therefore this is the correct answer.

Answer choice (C): This answer affirms that when the cause occurs, then the effect occurs. The
answer therefore strengthens the argument.

Answer choice (D): Like answer choice (C), this answer shows that when the cause is present, then
the effect is present, and makes the case stronger by comparing that scenario to regions where the
cause is absent, and the effect is not as pronounced as when the cause is present.

Answer choice (E): This answer choice strengthens the argument by showing that the data used to
make the argument are accurate.
 srcline@noctrl.edu
  • Posts: 243
  • Joined: Oct 16, 2015
|
#21824
Hello

After looking this answer over a couple of times, is A not even relevant to the argument? Because it says that Most oil-refinery workers who do not work with MBTE do not have serious health problems etc....?
Whereas the conclusion is talking about MBTE :arrow: increased incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath?

Thankyou
Sarah
 David Boyle
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 836
  • Joined: Jun 07, 2013
|
#21869
srcline@noctrl.edu wrote:Hello

After looking this answer over a couple of times, is A not even relevant to the argument? Because it says that Most oil-refinery workers who do not work with MBTE do not have serious health problems etc....?
Whereas the conclusion is talking about MBTE :arrow: increased incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath?

Thankyou
Sarah
Hello Sarah,

With causality, it does help to say that if A purportedly causes B, that when there's no A, there's no B. It isn't definitive proof that A causes B, but it does help some, since, e.g., it establishes that A could indeed be a cause of B.

Hope this helps,
David

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.