- Posts: 11
- Joined: Feb 12, 2021
My prewrite had a different flaw than the correct answer choice. I wrote that the author of the stimulus assumes that the news report articles on coffee were conducted by experts. We do not know that it was experts who wrote these articles. All we know is the news reports are referring to articles about coffee.
Would this be an equally valid flaw with the argument given that the question stem specifically mentions "a" flaw (as opposed to "the" flaw) in the argument?