- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 8916
- Joined: Feb 02, 2011
- Mon Apr 18, 2016 4:09 pm
#23208
Complete Question Explanation
Parallel Reasoning. The correct answer choice is (B)
Because insomnia can result from thoughts that arise in either half of the brain, the author advocates adopting a strategy (counting sheep) that will eliminate the possibility of either cause producing the undesired effect (insomnia).
Answer choice (A): The conclusion test can quickly eliminate this answer choice, since the argument in the stimulus does not advocate adopting one or another of two strategies instead of a third. This answer choice is incorrect.
Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. Just as insomnia can be the product of thoughts arising in either half of the brain, furniture damage can result from either cats' claws or their teeth. In both arguments, the proposed solution (counting sheep, toy mice) eliminates both potential causes of the problem.
Answer choice (C): The conclusion in this answer choice suggests that there are two ways of accomplishing the same goal (going to Centreville), not that there is a singular way of solving two distinct problems (which is the argument in the stimulus). The conclusion test is a quick way to prove that answer choice (C) is incorrect.
Answer choice (D): Storing both chemicals separately does not eliminate two potential causes of a given undesirable effect, but only one — the risk of explosion.
Answer choice (E): As with answer choice (A), the conclusion test can quickly eliminate this answer choice as well, since the stimulus does not advocate adopting one strategy over another.
Parallel Reasoning. The correct answer choice is (B)
Because insomnia can result from thoughts that arise in either half of the brain, the author advocates adopting a strategy (counting sheep) that will eliminate the possibility of either cause producing the undesired effect (insomnia).
Answer choice (A): The conclusion test can quickly eliminate this answer choice, since the argument in the stimulus does not advocate adopting one or another of two strategies instead of a third. This answer choice is incorrect.
Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. Just as insomnia can be the product of thoughts arising in either half of the brain, furniture damage can result from either cats' claws or their teeth. In both arguments, the proposed solution (counting sheep, toy mice) eliminates both potential causes of the problem.
Answer choice (C): The conclusion in this answer choice suggests that there are two ways of accomplishing the same goal (going to Centreville), not that there is a singular way of solving two distinct problems (which is the argument in the stimulus). The conclusion test is a quick way to prove that answer choice (C) is incorrect.
Answer choice (D): Storing both chemicals separately does not eliminate two potential causes of a given undesirable effect, but only one — the risk of explosion.
Answer choice (E): As with answer choice (A), the conclusion test can quickly eliminate this answer choice as well, since the stimulus does not advocate adopting one strategy over another.
