LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#73956
Complete Question Explanation

Strengthen. The correct answer choice is (A)

The theory discussed in the stimulus is a real scientific hypothesis, often called the “Pangaea
Theory.” Alfred Wegener, who has been the subject of other LSAT questions, theorized in 1915 that
Pangaea was a “supercontinent” composed of all landmasses. The theory is attractive because when
the shape of today’s continents is examined, the continents roughly fit together.
The question stem specifically asks you to strengthen the hypothesis that South America and Africa
were once joined. To do so, you must identify evidence about the landmasses, as this is the evidence
that the hypothesis in the stimulus relies upon.

Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice, and this is the only answer that addresses the
land.
By tying the rock strata of each continent together, the answer supports the idea that there was
once a physical connection between the two continents. A high percentage of test takers correctly
identify this answer.

Answer choice (B): This answer addresses people, not land. As with the earlier turtle question in the
Chapter Seven Problem Set, the genetic similarity could be the result of humans from different areas
sharing a large amount of DNA.

Answer choice (C): The similarity of climates does not help establish that the landmasses were once
connected. For example, the similarity could be the result of both continents largely straddling the
equator.

Answer choice (D): The language of the people does not mean the continents were connected.
Australians and Americans share the same language, but this is because both areas were populated in
modern times by English-speaking people from Britain.

Answer choice (E): The resemblance of plants in both areas does not suggest or strengthen the idea
that the continents were joined. Plant similarities could be the result of climate, or perhaps of manmade
propagation efforts.
User avatar
 amazagri
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: May 14, 2021
|
#87261
I disagree with E and D as well as the explanation for B. Genetic similarity can be a way of showing people descented from each other, as dna studies show genetic clusters. The problem with B is we dont know if the people in brazil just recently moves from west africa to live there. There is no indication of what "people" they are referring it - as in it may be the people who have always been indigineous.

D talks about similar lingusitics. In this context it is clearly talking about people who lives in tribes, in other words, the indigenous people of that part of the world. Clearly those people did not travel to south america on a ship because they live in mudhuts until today, and most of the time arent even fully clothed. So clearly they never developed that type of navel mastery. So then how did they get there, if the continent were split apart? clearly it supports the idea because if the language is similar, then they branched out from a similar lingustics branch - think how spanish, french, italian, romanian all came from Latin. Some thing here, so this strengthen the idea of the continent being together. The question is obviously why A over D. Well, the question is asking "most strengthen" and A is a much better answer because it talks about "rare" stone - the usage of the word rare is what makes it stronger.
User avatar
 amazagri
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: May 14, 2021
|
#87279
i would also argue that when it says band of rocks, this is no indication that it is talking about stratum layers. This could mean a group of rock on normal levels. Google a discordant coastline and it refers to a photo of a band of rocks just a long the coast, and not located on a stratum.
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1787
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#87380
amazagri,

Given how long ago the continents would have drifted apart, information about genetic or linguistic similarities of human populations would not strengthen this argument at all.

As for the second post, "band" and "stratum" are synonyms. Rock strata are bands of rock.

Robert Carroll

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.