LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 9031
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#23648
Complete Question Explanation

Point at Issue. The correct answer choice is (A)

This stimulus presents a potentially tricky numbers and percentages scenario:

Larew asserts that, because those with the least money saw a higher percentage increase in their average income, they got more benefit than the rich got from their increases.

Mendota disagrees, with a point that might best be seen in a hypothetical scenario:

If an average person from the bottom quintile earned $10000 ten years ago, and today earns $5000 more, that represents a 50% increase.

Meanwhile, a wealthy person who 10 years ago earned $500,000 saw an increase of only 10% increase, and is now earning $50,000 more than before.

Thus we can see that the wealthy person saw a smaller percentage increase, but the amount of their increase was, nonetheless, greater.

Only correct answer choice (A) accurately reflects this point of contention, and passes the Agree/Disagree test:. Larew believes that the change is prosperity is accurately measured by this comparison of percentage changes, whereas Mendota disagrees, pointing out that the absolute value of the change, dollar for dollar, is greater for the top quintile.
 olafimihan.k
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: Jul 04, 2017
|
#37743
Could you explain why AC B is wrong?
 Francis O'Rourke
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 471
  • Joined: Mar 10, 2017
|
#37770
Hi Olaf,

Answer choice (B) states that Larew and Mendota disagree over whether to measurements prosperity for the lowest quintile relative to the highest quintile, or not. This is actually something that they agree on.

Larew believes that we should compare the percent change between the highest and lowest. Mendota believes that we should compare the absolute income change in the highest and lowest quintiles. Both believe that we should measure the prosperity of the lowest group to the highest. They only differ in terms of how to compare the two groups.
 saiffshaikhh@gmail.com
  • Posts: 58
  • Joined: May 04, 2023
|
#113215
Narrowed it down to A & B, was going to go with A, but on a second glance chose B. Any idea on how to best decipher that B was the not the answer to choose? I try to eliminate the weaker answer but failed to do so in this instance.
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1037
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#113227
Hi saiffshaikhh!

Regarding how best to decipher that (B) is incorrect, I'd encourage you to use the Agree/Disagree test. First, put initials for each of the speakers next to a contender answer choice, such as (B). Then ask whether each speaker would agree or disagree with the statement and write "agree" or "disagree" next to the appropriate initials. In this case, we're asked for a point of disagreement. We therefore want an answer choice that one of them would agree with but the other would not.

As the administrator summarizes above, we have this with answer choice (A). It is something with which Larew agrees but with which Mendota disagrees. Regarding answer choice (B), we don't know either speaker's position on that point, meaning that it's not a point of disagreement between them.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.