LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 nivernova
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: Jul 11, 2022
|
#99455
Can we ignore answer choices that one "should not" fulfill one's duty??

because it's a sufficient condition of the contrapositive of the principle

i.e) Should not fulfill -> Overwhelming evidence

and overwhelming evidence, which is a condition necessary, doesn't GUARANTEE that a duty should not be performed(Sufficient).

Based on this reasoning, I eliminated B,C and E.

Was I right in doing so?
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#99467
Hi nivernova,

I would certainly start with ones that focus on situations where we "should" fulfill a duty. Our conditional relationship makes "fulfilling a duty" the necessary condition, so we want to find situations where that occurs. However, they could look to the contrapositive of the conditional statement (if you shouldn't fulfill a duty, then you must have overwhelming evidence of disastrous consequences). I would read all five answer choices, but focus my attention on the ones that draw a conclusion that the person should fulfill their duty.

Good work!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.