LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Blueballoon5%
  • Posts: 156
  • Joined: Jul 13, 2015
|
#57336
I narrowed the answer choices to B and C, and I ultimately chose the right answer because this seemed more accurate. But I am still struggling to see why answer choice C is wrong.

I hope you can help!
 Lauren Hartfiel
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Sep 26, 2018
|
#59882
Hi!

The conclusion is: environmentalists would be misguided if they attributed the loss of a population to pollution in all cases.
Answer B is:The loss of a specific population should not always be interpreted as a sign of environmental degradation.
Answer C is: Environmentalists’ use of indicator species in tracking the effects of pollution is often problematic.

The conclusion and B are both conditional statements using would and should, C states that it IS a past and current problem, which is a higher degree of certainty, also C does not offer advice to environmentalists.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you need further explanation:)

Best.
Lauren

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.