LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1787
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#93523
ashpine,

The Administrator's post at the start of this thread does provide a structural approach.

Robert Carroll
User avatar
 ashpine17
  • Posts: 321
  • Joined: Apr 06, 2021
|
#98235
Is there a way to approach this intuitively, aka no diagramming? This is one instance in which I feel that diagramming makes it more confusing and cluttered
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#98624
Ashpine, if I was going to do this without diagramming, I would focus on the difference between the premise(s) and the conclusion. The conclusion is that there's a difference between beauty and truth. The premise is that the most realistic art is the most truthful, therefore it would be the best. I would focus on the idea that best is different than beautiful, and I'd like the answer to address that gap between the premise and conclusion. I know the argument assumes a link between beauty and "best" in artwork, and therefore, I would prephrase something to make that connection.

Hope that helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.