LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 toddburtron@gmail.com
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: Jun 11, 2021
|
#90426
I am studying for my second go at LSAT. After reading the posts I am still struggling to best isolate the S&N conditions in order to diagram -it just isn't intuitive for me.

What is more confusing is I immediately eliminated D as a contender due to reading computers within the answer. I considered this as outside/new information and marked it as a loser given this is MBT problem.

Help me?
User avatar
 evelineliu
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: Sep 06, 2021
|
#90481
Hi Todd,

The stimulus has two formal logic sentences:
  • If great art --> express deep emotion
  • If express deep emotion --> creator capable of experiencing deep emotion
By combining the two, we have:
  • If great art --> express deep emotion --> creator capable of experiencing deep emotion
The contrapositive of the chain is this:
  • If creator NOT capable of experience deep emotion --> NOT great art
(D) matches the contrapositive. Computers are not out of scope because the formal logic applies to all creators of art (people, computers, dogs, etc.). Any creator of art incapable of experience deep emotion will not create great art.

Best,
Eveline
 Tara F
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Nov 28, 2022
|
#98690
Why are we "Combining the first statement with the contrapositive of the second to arrive at"?
and wouldn't that be:
NOTGA--NOTDE--CE--AEE?

not great Art--Not deep expression--Capable ExpressingE---AExpress Emotion?
(sorry I don't know the keys for symbols)
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 742
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#98709
Hi Tara F!

Happy to address the diagramming in this question.

Why are we "Combining the first statement with the contrapositive of the second to arrive at"?
One general reason is that this is a must be true question. Sometimes the correct answer choice might directly follow and be immediately apparent from statements or conditional reasoning in the stimulus. But often the correct answer choice might only be obvious after one has worked with the conditional reasoning to find inferences, which might require chaining statements together or taking contrapositives.

Here, we have the first statement, "To be great, an artwork must express a deep emotion, such as sorrow or love." This can be diagrammed as:

GA :arrow: EDE
The second sentence, "But an artwork cannot express an emotion that the artwork’s creator is incapable of experiencing," can be diagrammed as:

CDE :arrow: EDE
That is, if the artwork's creator is not capable of experiencing deep emotion, then the artwork cannot express deep emotion. The contrapositive of this is:

EDE :arrow: CDE
With these variables, a reason to add the first statement with the contrapositive of the second is that this allows us to form a chain:

GA :arrow: EDE :arrow: CDE
We can then infer from this chain that:

GA :arrow: CDE
We also know the contrapositive of this is true, or:

CDE :arrow: GA
That is, if the artwork's creator is not capable of deep emotion, then it cannot be great artwork. This is reflected in answer choice (D).

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.