LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 rachue
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: Jun 22, 2011
|
#1734
Hi,

I see why D is correct here, that it targets the greater flaw in the argument, however I don't completely understand why E is wrong. Doesn't the argument make the assumption in E?

I'd appreciate some clarification. Thanks!
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5853
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#1735
Hi Rachel,

The statement in (E) is too strong to be an assumption: the word "only" means this was the sole defense mechanism, but we just don't know that.

Part of the way we can see (E) as incorrect is because the author refers to likelihoods in the stimulus. This opens the door to having other methods of defense available (although the author would likely believe those other defenses were less effective than coloration).

Please let me know if that helps. Thanks!
 rachue
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: Jun 22, 2011
|
#1739
But since the stimulus doesn't mention any other defense mechanisms, isn't that an assumption we take away? That blending was the ONLY mechanism? It was precisely because the author mentioned only the likelihoods of the blending mechanism, and drew the conclusion from the likelihood of lightly pigmented moths, that I thought the author was assuming that was the only defense mechanism available.

I'm still having a hard time understanding...
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5853
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#1749
You can't make that assumption either way because there's no language that indicates that blending was the only mechanism.

Let me refer you to question #3 in Lesson 1, on page 1-11. They talk about three students in the waiting room; does that mean they are the only three students in the waiting room? Not necessarily (see answer choice (C), which is wrong). Same situation here...
 rachue
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: Jun 22, 2011
|
#1786
That helps. Thank you.
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5853
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#1790
If you have time, examine that L1 question closely--I think it tells you a lot about what you can and can't assume in these problems.

Thanks!
 rachue
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: Jun 22, 2011
|
#1799
The similarity between the two is that we can only know what is directly stated in the premises, correct?
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5853
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#1825
Yes, and equally importunately, we can't make any assumptions about what else is going on in the situation. In the case of the L1 question, there could be other people in the room but there doesn't have to be (or that there could be other people registered for the beginners tennis clinic, or not). That type of uncertainty is an area they mine constantly on this test.
 rachue
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: Jun 22, 2011
|
#1835
That makes sense. Thanks.
 kappe
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: Jul 30, 2014
|
#17200
please explain the correct answer. and whats is that I am doing that is not allowing me to see the issue

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.