LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

#16 - Roxanne promised Luke that she would finish their

 sicm91
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: Mar 23, 2021
|
-  Wed May 19, 2021 2:10 pm #87193
Hey! I chose D because it logically completes the argument, but also we could eliminate A, C, and E because it establishes that something would be wrong rather than NOT wrong, right? In other words, the stimulus does not give us enough information to establish what could be wrong, correct?

Thank you so much!
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1787
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
-  Thu May 20, 2021 11:23 am #87216
sicm,

That looks quite right to me. The stimulus is trying to establish an analogy between a case where something isn't wrong and...the case with Roxanne and Luke. Because the lunch case concludes that something isn't wrong, the analogous case with Roxanne and Luke should also conclude that something isn't wrong. Good job!

Robert Carroll
 Return to “Section 1”

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.

Subscribe today!