LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#32480
Complete Question Explanation

Must Be True—PR, SN. The correct answer choice is (D)

This question is very much like Question 19, in that both have a stimulus containing a one-sentence principle. The difference between the questions is that Question 19 was a Cannot Be True—Principle question, while this is a Must Be True—Principle question.

The principle here is that if a government official has knowledge, not available to the general public, of an impending policy, and uses that knowledge to financially benefit himself, then that use of knowledge is unethical. We can diagram this rule as:


GO = government official
USK = uses secret knowledge
FB = financially benefit himself/herself
Ethical = the use of knowledge is ethical

..... ..... ..... Sufficient ..... ..... Necessary

..... ..... ..... GO

..... ..... ..... +

..... ..... ..... USK ..... :arrow: ..... Ethical

..... ..... ..... +

..... ..... ..... FB


Our job is to compare this principle to the factual scenarios provided in each answer choice. The correct answer will contain elements matching each of the three sufficient conditions, proving that the action was unethical.

Answer choice (A): This scenario does not tell us that the former employee, now a government official, used secret knowledge of impending policies to benefit himself financially. Although the names of the bidders were not released publicly, there is no indication that the official used this knowledge to give anyone, let alone himself, any benefit.

Answer choice (B): The officer is now retired, and so is no longer a government official. Also, it is not clear that the officer uses secret knowledge of impending policies to benefit himself.

Answer choice (C): The official in this scenario used public knowledge of an enacted policy to benefit herself financially, not secret knowledge of a impending policy.

Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice, because the scenario it depicts matches all three of the sufficient conditions. The government official used secret knowledge of the impending tax policy to benefit himself financially, by avoiding the new tax.

Answer choice (E): This official made the information about the investigation into Acme public before she acted on it, and the issue was an investigation, not a policy. So, she did not act on secret knowledge of an impending policy.
 catatom
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2020
|
#77933
What confused me about answer D is that it was not clear that the finance department official is a government official.
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#77995
Hi Catatom,

We can tell that the answer choice refers to a government official in two ways. First is the use of the term "official." If we were talking about a private company, we would use words like "executive" or "officer," but not "official." Notice the use of the word official in other answer choices as well to clearly describe government workers. Additionally here, we have the description of knowledge that the official has. The official knew about a non-public future tax as part of their work, something that would not be the case for a private employee of a company, but would be the case for a government official.

Hope that helps
Rachael

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.