LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 haganskl
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: May 30, 2019
|
#73461
Thank you, James Finch. This explanation really helps.
User avatar
 Mmjd12
  • Posts: 63
  • Joined: Apr 12, 2023
|
#106938
Hi PowerScore,

Just to confirm my understanding of nested conditionals:

For the contrapoisitive to be applied, i.e for there not be a requirement to report, there must not be, both personal injury and damages exceeding $500 OR there must not be the capablitity to report.

So, scenario 1, one does not need to report if there is no capability to report. Or scenario 2, one does not need to report if there is, simultaneously, no personal injury AND damages don’t exceed $500.

Would it be correct to break up a nested conditional into two diagrams?

Report :arrow: Personal Injury AND >$500

Report :arrow: Capable of Reporting
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 807
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#106981
Hi Mmjd12!

Your diagrams seem to make sense (though it could be helpful if those two statements were connected, so that you know that it's either one or the other scenario if there's no report). Reports are necessary if there is personal injury or damage exceeds $500, so if a report was not necessary, then we know that there was no personal injury and it was not over $500 in damage, OR another scenario occurs, namely, the person is incapable of making a report.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.