LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8314
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#45223
Please post your questions below! Thank you!
 nihals23
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Oct 01, 2018
|
#59163
Just a quick question. Refering to option D, isnt Oritz raising a counterexample by asking if there are any other factors leading up to heart disease? I get why E is right, but D seems just as plausible. I must say, the LSAC is pretty good at what they do! This looks like such an easy question; I brushed right through it without paying much heed to E.
 Malila Robinson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 296
  • Joined: Feb 01, 2018
|
#59381
Hi Nihals23,
A counterexample would need to be specific, but "other lifestyle factors" is vague. So rather than reaching the specificity required for a counterexample, it is better described as "alternate explanations" which matches with the level of vagueness inherent in Ortiz's response. That leads to E as the correct answer.
Hope that helps!
-Malila
User avatar
 ErikaChavana18
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: Jul 31, 2021
|
#89250
Hello! I don't quite understand the difference between answer choice B and D. I chose B and from my perspective, it seems like the two choices are almost saying the same thing. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
User avatar
 atierney
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 89
  • Joined: Jul 06, 2021
|
#89350
Hi Erika,

I noticed that you didn't mention the correct answer choice in your question, and instead specifically about differentiating two wrong answer choices. Typically we see questions related to the correct answer choice and how it may be differentiated from other contenders. I would definitely go back and make sure you on board with the correct being E, as Ortiz here, certainly raises about alternative explanations for the finding of the study mentioned by Merton. For me, considering this question, I found E to stick out above the answer choices; however, let's consider B and D:

B mentions the effects of air pollution, and so this answer choice is dead before delivery, because Ortiz doesn't comment on air pollution, either directly or indirectly. In other words, if you were to turn this question into a point at issue question, Ortiz's opinion on air pollution is unknown; he doesn't address it in his response to Merton. Therefore, any answer choice that delves into air pollution without more, would be incorrect here.

D mentions that Ortiz provides a counterexample to Merton's general conclusion. Now this is tricky because, I think both parts of this answer choice are inapplicable to this particular stimulus. The term "general conclusion" will typically apply to those situations in which a general principle or law is being realized. In other words, you're unlikely to see "general conclusion" applied to a conclusion relating a specific cause to a specific effect, as one seeks to do in interpreting the results of a study. So, when I see general conclusion, I immediately eliminate it. However, Ortiz really doesn't provide a specific counterexample either. He simply opens the door to other possibilities, and therefore, it would not be accurate to label his retort as "raising a (specific) counterexample."

Now, in terms of differentiating the two answers, even though, to reiterate, they are both incorrect here, I would say that answer B would apply to situations in which an evaluation of the thing whose effects are being raise is occurring, so that we might imagine a general debate on the merits of air pollution, or whether certain actions should be taken to directly impact air pollution, something where the thing being raise, once again, has effects that are not being directly implicated in the argument at hand, and that there is some reason to believe they should be.

D, meanwhile, could definitely occur in a similar context, the general conclusion is "air pollution is bad," and the counterexample is, well, it makes the sky in San Francisco look cool! However, I think that the point of differentiation would be whether the person making the counterpoint is using one specific counterexample, or whether the person is merely trying to open the door for other effects of said thing to be considered, in which case B would be the better answer.

Let me know if you have further questions on this.
User avatar
 ErikaChavana18
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: Jul 31, 2021
|
#89398
Opps! I did mean to say E instead of D! I needed clarification between answer choice E and B, but your explanation of answer choice b did help! I think when I was taking the test I saw Merton mention air pollution and I knew Ortiz wanted alternative explanations for the study, so I saw that answer choice and just ran with it without realizing Ortiz didn't even have an opinion on it. Ortiz only had an opinion about the study, which answer choice e addresses. Looking back now, this question is fairly simple, and I learned that I need to slow down and read very carefully.

Thank you!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.