LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5853
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#49525
Setup and Rule Diagram Explanation

This is a Grouping Game: Defined-Moving, Balanced, Numerical Distribution, Identify the Possibilities.
F94_Game_#2_setup_diagram 1.png
The first three rules establish a 2-2-1-1 unfixed numerical distribution. Because of the blocks the distribution of the variables is as follows:
F94_Game_#2_setup_diagram 2.png
Because of this distribution, J must review Wolves and the HF block must review either Retreat or Seasonings.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 Anothertesttaker
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Jan 27, 2019
|
#63362
The rule stating that J reviews M or W is kind of tricky rule because it forces you to make an inference that part of the rule is not possible. I have not encountered this any other time during my reviews and I was wondering if rules similar to this appear regularly? Any trends on recent tests?
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#63379
Hi Anothertesttaker,

The J goes in W inference is really huge, isn't it? But it's the sort of inference that we see a lot. Games are all about finding limitations, drawing inferences that give us extra information than the rules directly state.

For example, the June 2002 trucks game has rules that seem to allow for multiple options. Each truck could be red or green. But without directly stating that certain trucks were certain colors, the inferences let us know that truck 4 is Y, and is green. That's no different than the rules in this game limiting J. We use inferences to get certainty about games all the time. That's the goal.

Inferences are power in the games. Don't hesitate from powerful inferences. It's true that incorrect inferences are dangerous, but correct inferences can be strong or weak. They can give us a small amount of information about the game or a huge amount. But as long as the logic is good, and as long as you are confident in your reasoning, go with it!

Hope that helps!
Rachael
 davidl113
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Sep 24, 2019
|
#72057
I used the reviewers as my base. Is this an incorrect approach? I find it that it makes much more sense to do it this way.
 Jeremy Press
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1000
  • Joined: Jun 12, 2017
|
#72094
Hi David,

It's something of an arbitrary choice in this game, and I'm sure you could make the game work fine with the reviewers as your "base." Typically in a grouping game, I'd select as the "base" the variable set that had the potential to be larger than just 1 variable in size. In other words, because of the rules, in your setup the reviewers will all have exactly 1 variable in them constituting their "group." With the movies as a base, they will each have either 1 or 2 members constituting their "group." It's not entirely necessary to operate that way. I just tend to find it cleaner and more efficient.

I hope this helps!

Jeremy

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.