LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#47020
Complete Question Explanation
(The complete setup for this game can be found here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=15947)

The correct answer choice is (E)

If R speaks first at meetings 1 and 2, and S speaks first at meeting 3, then, according to our analysis of the second rule, R must speak fifth at meeting 3 and S must speak fifth at meetings 1 and 2. It follows that answer choice (E) is correct.
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5852
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#19317

This is a challenging game, and the second rule is usually the culprit. Just for the benefit of anyone else who might come across this question, the rule means this: if you are fifth at one of the meetings, then you MUST be first at at least one of the other meetings (note that "at least;" the rule doesn't say "exactly one meeting" but if it it did, it would change this game and question significantly). So, let's take a look at #22 and see what happens.

Question #22. The application of the second rule causes a lot of problems because of the limited number of slots for first and fifth speakers. From the question stem, we know the following about the first speakers at each meeting:


Meeting 1: R ___ ___ ___ ___

Meeting 2: R ___ ___ ___ ___

Meeting 3: S ___ ___ ___ ___

..... ..... 1 2 3 4 5


Because the second rule involves the first speakers, we need to be aware of how this affects the fifth speakers at each meeting. Having only R and S is incredibly limiting because it means that Q, T, and U cannot speak fifth at any meeting (because there's no room for them to speak first). So, only R or S could speak fifth at any given meeting. This fact is critically important to this question.

A student asked me why answer choice (D) is not correct. The problem with (D) is that it doesn't leave us enough speakers for the fifth slots. Let's look at it:

Answer choice (D) states that S speaks fifth at exactly one of the meetings. Now, that could be Meeting 1 or Meeting 2 (it can't be Meeting 3 since S is already speaking first at that meeting). For discussion purposes, let's say it's Meeting 1:


Meeting 1: R ___ ___ ___ S

Meeting 2: R ___ ___ ___ ___

Meeting 3: S ___ ___ ___ ___

..... ..... 1 2 3 4 5


So, who is left to speak fifth at Meetings 2 and 3? Well, it can't be Q, T, and U, and now S is out since (D) is clear about S speaking fifth at "exactly one" meeting. That means it has to be R. But that means we have a problem, since while R could do that at Meeting 3, it can't speak fifth at Meeting 2 (in this particular hypothetical), since it's already speaking first. We run into the same problem if S speaks fifth at only Meeting 2, and thus there's no way we can get a workable solution if S speaks fifth at exactly one of the meetings. Thus, answer choice (D) cannot occur.

Please let me know if that helps. Thanks!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.