- Mon May 30, 2016 2:19 pm
Sure thing! The focal point here is the word "depends." That's a word synonymous with the idea of "need," or "requirement," and thus at the heart of Assumption questions.
Again, I'll point you back to the discussion of Assumption questions on pages 66-68 for a detailed breakdown, and hit the highlights here: Assumption questions ask for an answer that is required by the argument. In other words, an unexpressed idea that the author's conclusion simply cannot live without. Put another way, an idea that the conclusion "depends" on. That's why #30 is Assumption.
Justify on the other hand asks for an idea that the conclusion doesn't need, but rather that would make the conclusion undeniably true. If you think back to the discussion of conditional reasoning in the course, Assumptions function like the Necessary conditions (they're required by something else), and Justify answer acts like the Sufficient conditions (they're enough to conclude an additional idea). That's the key distinction between the types, and the easiest way to tell the question stems apart.
I hope that helps!
PowerScore Test Preparation
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/jonmdenning
My LSAT Articles: http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/author/jon-denning