LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 gingerale
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: Feb 15, 2021
|
#85796
I've read through this thread and I'm still confused about how B is correct. I chose A, but didn't feel good about any of the answers. I thought that B was incorrect because the author of passage A provided that these flat tax systems are inherently less complex, making tax avoidance significantly more difficult. They even reference the flat tax system in Estonia, where there are "no schedule of rates, no deductions." I ruled out B based on this information in the text, as I thought the simplistic nature of the flat tax system would get rid of the loopholes and special deductions referenced in B and would have an easy retort to the author of A had they responded with B. Why is B correct over A?
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5204
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#86362
The focus of the question stem has the answer for you, gingerale. We aren't looking to respond to the entire argument presented by Author A, but only to the last argument she made, which basically boiled down to "high earners are paying the same as lower earners anyway, so progressive taxes don't really work and we should switch to a flaw tax." Author B's response could be what answer B says, that the problem isn't that the tax is progressive, but just that it has too many loopholes. Don't scrap the progressive tax and switch to a flat tax, but just fix the loopholes!
User avatar
 cd1010
  • Posts: 74
  • Joined: Jul 12, 2022
|
#106432
I ended up picking B, but flagged it because I was unsure. B says: "Existing tax codes allow tax avoidance by those with high incomes mainly because they contain loopholes and special deductions, not because they are graduated.". When I read this, I did feel like this would be a counter-argument for Author A. However, where I was getting confused was the part of the q "would be the most reasonable response for the author of passage B ". Because Author B didn't mention loopholes, I wasn't sure if I had enough evidence to say that author B would actually say this?

What I mean is, if the question were worded as a more normal weaken question to the argument of passage A, then I would have been more comfortable picking Answer choice B. But, I felt like I had to test whether author B would actually say Answer Choice B, and that one felt a little uncertain to me.

Thanks!
User avatar
 Dana D
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: Feb 06, 2024
|
#106436
Hey CD,

The author of Passage B doesn't use the word loophole, but passage B is arguing for graduated taxing. Passage A argues that graduated taxing allows people to avoid taxes - if the author for Passage B wanted to weaken this argument, they could offer answer choice (B) up in defense. It's fine that Passage B didn't ever mention loopholes - answer (B) is still the right answer because it attacks the last part of the argument in Passage A, as the question requests.
User avatar
 miriamson07
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Jul 10, 2024
|
#107475
Hello all,

I came across a new type of question stem in PrepTest 72, Section 4, question 27. It is as follows: “which one of the following, if true, would be the most reasonable response for the author of passage B to make to the final argument of passage A?”

I am tempted to categorize this stem as a “weaken/strengthen” type question. However, I am not 100% certain how to interpret the phrase “would be the most reasonable response.” Are they referring to “reasonable” in terms of being the best at weakening/strengthening, or “reasonable” in terms of the author being likely to use the argument? I see these as two different things.

Thank you very much.
User avatar
 Stephanie Oswalt
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 832
  • Joined: Jan 11, 2016
|
#107477
miriamson07 wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 3:00 am Hello all,

I came across a new type of question stem in PrepTest 72, Section 4, question 27. It is as follows: “which one of the following, if true, would be the most reasonable response for the author of passage B to make to the final argument of passage A?”

I am tempted to categorize this stem as a “weaken/strengthen” type question. However, I am not 100% certain how to interpret the phrase “would be the most reasonable response.” Are they referring to “reasonable” in terms of being the best at weakening/strengthening, or “reasonable” in terms of the author being likely to use the argument? I see these as two different things.

Thank you very much.
Hi!

I have moved your post to the thread discussing this question. Please review the explanation on page 1 of this thread, as well as the discussion that follows, and let us know if that helps! Thanks!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.