- Wed Sep 06, 2023 11:49 am
Your analysis is correct. Korobkin's view in the second paragraph functions as a rebuttal to Jackson's approach.
The final paragraph is not a refutation of this rebuttal as answer choice (C) suggests.
Rather, the final paragraph directly addresses Korobkin's approach, namely the principles of inclusion and rational planning, outlined in the third paragraph. The final paragraph does not functionally jump back and respond to the second paragraph. Instead, it relates directly to the third paragraph.
Further, the final paragraph does not fully "refute" Korobkin's position but instead examines it critically, highlights some of its disadvantageous implications, and calls into question its practicability. This is broadly consistent with the credited response, answer choice (A).