LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 avengingangel
  • Posts: 275
  • Joined: Jun 14, 2016
|
#27215
Hello again,

On page 333 in Chapter 10 (Justify the Conclusion), the book recommends to look at October 2010 LSAT LR Section 2, #25 for an example of a JTC question...

But #25 in Section 2 of that PT seems like a resolve the paradox, method of reasoning, or maybe evaluate the argument question stem... but definitely not JTC... I am confused..
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5853
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#27216
Hi Angel,

"LR2" is the second LR section, not the first, so on this particular test LR2 is Section 4 (and not Section 2). In LR2, Question #25 is a Justify question.

Just for future use, the two LR sections are always numbered 1 and 2, but that doesn't translate into the section where they appear. On the October 2010 LSAT, the sections are ordered as follows:

  • RC = Section 1
    LR1 = Section 2
    LG = Section 3
    LR2 = Section 4
The easiest trick is to always look at the other LR section too if you don't immediately see what you are looking for in the first section you look at :-D

Please let me know if that makes sense. Thanks!
 avengingangel
  • Posts: 275
  • Joined: Jun 14, 2016
|
#27244
Got it. I see how that's easy to mix up. Thanks for explaining!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.