- Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:37 am
#38743
Hi,
On Page 203, http://www.powerscore.com/lsat/content/ ... erpt_2.pdf
the second paragraph states that "When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurrence caused another, that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and that consequently the stated cause will always produce the effect. "
Does that mean when we have causality "A causes B" on the LSAT (not in the real world), the LSAT assumes that A is both the sufficient (the stated cause is the only possible cause) and the necessary (the stated cause will always produce) cause of B?
Thank you
On Page 203, http://www.powerscore.com/lsat/content/ ... erpt_2.pdf
the second paragraph states that "When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurrence caused another, that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and that consequently the stated cause will always produce the effect. "
Does that mean when we have causality "A causes B" on the LSAT (not in the real world), the LSAT assumes that A is both the sufficient (the stated cause is the only possible cause) and the necessary (the stated cause will always produce) cause of B?
Thank you