- Posts: 6
- Joined: Aug 24, 2021
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 6:43 pm
#93730
Hi,
I noticed similarities between words that indicate a correlation and words that show increases/decreases in likelihood and was wondering if they are similar concepts or overlapping concepts.
For example, there are words that typically show a correlation between two things, such as "rock climbers being more likely than others to have once suffered from a fear of heights."
Then, there are words that show a cause that increases the force of an effect, such as "confronting one's fears increases one's self-confidence."
From those two examples, can't it be said that the increases in likelihood words be used in the correlation example? Like, "being a rock climber (the cause) increases the chances that they once suffered from a fear of heights (the force of an effect; fear of heights is the effect)".
I hope this makes sense. Please help alleviate my confusion.
I noticed similarities between words that indicate a correlation and words that show increases/decreases in likelihood and was wondering if they are similar concepts or overlapping concepts.
For example, there are words that typically show a correlation between two things, such as "rock climbers being more likely than others to have once suffered from a fear of heights."
Then, there are words that show a cause that increases the force of an effect, such as "confronting one's fears increases one's self-confidence."
From those two examples, can't it be said that the increases in likelihood words be used in the correlation example? Like, "being a rock climber (the cause) increases the chances that they once suffered from a fear of heights (the force of an effect; fear of heights is the effect)".
I hope this makes sense. Please help alleviate my confusion.