# LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

## Conditional Reasoning Diagramming Drill #10, 11, 12

Mastering_LSAT
• Posts: 9
• Joined: Jul 30, 2020
#77578
Hello,

I hope you could help me to clarify diagramming of inferences and the inferences themselves. LGB 2019 edition, pages 76-77, is the source. Thank you for your time and help.

(1) Is it correct to diagram the second inference in #10 this way: J2 -> K1 rather than K1 -> J2? Is it correct to diagram the second inference in #11 this way: F1 -> G2 rather than G2 -> F1 ? Is there any difference? I feel that it may be wrong because I may have switched the sufficient and necessary conditions in these examples.

(2) If we were to apply the “Note” rules from #10 to #12 and had to draw inferences from the original statement of #12, would it be correct to conclude that #12 has the following two inferences: C7 -> A6 and C2 -> A1 ?

(3) You mentioned previously that inferences can be drawn from either an original statement or a contrapositive, as they are logically identical. I feel that sometimes it is easier to draw the inferences only from the original statement (e.g., #10) or from both the original statement and contrapositive (e.g., #11). Does it take practice and exposure to more logic games in order to easily draw all the existing inferences from either the original statement or contrapositive, and not both?

(4) Do I have the right thought process about making the inferences in #11 based on the original statement alone?

The original statement in #11 states: If G is cleaned before F, then F is cleaned second. It means that in this example we have only two letter variables “G” and “F” and only two time/order variables which are “first” and “second”. Since “no ties” are possible in this example, it means that both “G” and “F” cannot be cleaned at the same time as either “first” or “second”. In other words, if G is cleaned first then F can be only cleaned second, and vice versa. That is why we have only two inferences based on the original statement: If F is cleaned second then the only remaining time/order variable for G is first, and vice versa.

Thanks again for your time and help.
Stephanie Turaj
• PowerScore Staff
• Posts: 459
• Joined: Jan 11, 2016
#77612
Hi Mastering_LSAT,

Thanks for the post, and welcome to the forum! We actually have several different posts that discuss these drills, so I'm going to link you to those first.

#8-12:
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=31830

#10:
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=32025

#11:
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=28532
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=31410
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=16875

#12:
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=28504

If after reviewing the above posts you still have additional questions, please let us know!

Thanks!
Mastering_LSAT
• Posts: 9
• Joined: Jul 30, 2020
#77728
Hello Stephanie. Thanks for the links. Before making my post I reviewed these links and could not find answers to my questions. Could someone please answer the questions that I asked? Thank you again for your time and help.
Dave Killoran
• PowerScore Staff
• Posts: 4259
• Joined: Mar 25, 2011
#77893
Hi Mastering,

Thanks for the reply. We are trying to keep topics as separate as possible in order to increase usability, so to have these answered, you need to post each onto the ends of the specific threads above (the individually numbered ones). That allows us to isolate the question and provide the fastest answers, and it also helps others who are searching for answers to specific drill questions

Thanks!

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.