LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8919
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#72691
Complete Question Explanation

Strengthen—Principle. The correct answer choice is (B).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice.

Answer choice (C):

Answer choice (D):

Answer choice (E):


This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
User avatar
 Tami Taylor
  • Posts: 38
  • Joined: Jan 03, 2021
|
#83651
Hello!

Can you help me understand why (B) is the correct answer and whether I'm dissecting the argument in the correct way?

From what I can tell, there's a gap in the argument. The conclusion is that the airline schemes are almost entirely ineffective at reducing carbon emissions. The intermediate conclusion, in the second sentence, tells us why -- no carbon emissions are prevented by the airline schemes, since the projects that the airlines/airline passengers are contributing to would have occurred without their donations. When I first read this, I think, "Huh, that's a big jump. I still don't understand why the donations aren't making any contribution at all to the fight against carbon emissions."

If we apply (B) to the stimulus, however, it tells us that since the projects to reduce carbon emissions would have occurred in the absence of airline donations, any reductions in carbon emissions are not a result or consequence of the airline donations.

Am I on the right track with my ~logical reasoning?~

Thank you!
User avatar
 KelseyWoods
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1079
  • Joined: Jun 26, 2013
|
#83727
Hi Tami!

Yes, you are on the right track. With Strengthen-Principle questions like this, you're really just looking for a principle in the answer choices that matches the reasoning above. A principle is just a broad rule. So basically you're looking for a rule that says that if the premise is true, then the conclusion is true.

If we break down this argument, it is basically:

Premise: in most cases the projects that reduce carbon emissions would have proceeded even without using money from the carbon emissions offsetting fee
Conclusion: no carbon emissions are prevented by the fee

Answer choice (B) states: "If an outcome would have occurred in the absence of a certain action, then the outcome was not a consequence of that action."

This matches the reasoning in the argument because the premises are basically saying that the reduction in carbon emissions (outcome) would have occurred in the absence of the offset fee (action) and the conclusion is then saying that the reduction in carbon emissions (outcome) is not due to the offset fee (action).

It really is just about breaking down the reasoning in the argument and then finding the rule that matches it, just as you did!

Hope this helps!

Best,
Kelsey
User avatar
 Tami Taylor
  • Posts: 38
  • Joined: Jan 03, 2021
|
#83732
Got it. Thank you!
User avatar
 christinecwt
  • Posts: 74
  • Joined: May 09, 2022
|
#95557
Hi Team - may I know why Answer Choice A is incorrect? Thanks!
User avatar
 katehos
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 184
  • Joined: Mar 31, 2022
|
#95595
Hi Christine,

Answer choice (A) does not provide a principle that helps strengthen the argument because the principle asserted in (A) is not relevant to the conclusion in the stimulus.

Broken down, the stimulus looks like this:

Premise: Projects by airlines that reduce carbon emissions would have proceeded without the fees
Conclusion: No carbon emissions are prevented by the fees

If we try to apply the principle in (A), that steps taken to mitigate harmful effects of freely chosen actions do not absolve one from the original harm, it does not strengthen the argument. The stimulus does not assert that the fees are meant to absolve someone of responsibility for carbon emissions, it simply argues that the fees are ineffective because they do not actually prevent carbon emissions.

Answer choice (B), on the other hand, helps justify the argument's reasoning! Feel free to refer to previous answers by fellow PowerScore instructors for more clarity on why this is the case. :)

I hope this helps!
-Kate

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.