LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5853
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#72667
Complete Question Explanation

Flaw, SN. The correct answer choice is (D).

The stimulus sets up a conditional relationship in the first sentence:

  • Plenty of water/sun
    ..... + ..... ..... ..... ..... :arrow: ..... Productive
    Planted in rich soil
Note that the contrapositive of this statement—which we do NOT recommend writing out separately during the problem due to time reasons (and the fact that you should automatically know what the contrapositive of any statement)—is:

  • ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Plenty of water/sun
    Productive ..... :arrow: ..... ..... or
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Planted in rich soil
The stimulus then continues on to disclose that Patricia has located her garden in area that meets both necessary conditions, namely that it has "Plenty of water/sun" and is "Planted in rich soil." From there, the stimulus then concludes that the sufficient condition must have occurred, namely that her garden will be "Productive."

Thus, the error that has occurred here is the Mistaken Reversal of the second diagram, or, alternately, the Mistaken Negation of the first diagram. Note that both these errors are contrapositives of each other, and thus different ways of expressing the same basic flaw, one where the author mixed up the conditions. Consequently, you should seek an answer that address the conditional nature of the error here.

Answer choice (A): The use of "ideal" in this problem can reasonably be understood to mean that plenty of water and sunlight will be available (since that was the prior context). Thus, this is not an issue in the stimulus.

Answer choice (B): The error is not causal in nature, and thus this answer is incorrect.

Answer choice (C): The error is not causal in nature, and thus this answer is incorrect.

Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice. This answer properly identifies the error in play, where the author confused what was necessary for what was sufficient (and vice versa).

Answer choice (E): This answer is incorrect because the first sentence is absolute in explaining the relationship between productive gardens, water/sun, and soil. At that point, all examples either conform to that relationship or not, and thus sampling isn't applicable here.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.