LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8917
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#71183
Please post your questions below! Thank you!
 nyc431
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: Jun 15, 2021
|
#90241
Was wondering if you could help with this. I found both options D and E compelling.

I can see that D fits - similar arguments about lying needed in certain lit genres -- historical novels and autobiographies.

But I can also see how E would fit. The "same principles" being that lying is necessary when writing both a historical novel or autobiography. And the unethical view in B is a different view "in practice." But should the unethical part about lying in B be interpreted as a principle -- and because this is absent from A, the passages don't have the same principles?
User avatar
 atierney
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 215
  • Joined: Jul 06, 2021
|
#90245
With regard to E, it's not clear exactly what conflicting interpretations exist as to principles endorsed. They each endorse the necessity of telling lies to produce quality narratives in different contexts, and the differences within their arguments, to my reading, are based upon these contextual distinctions. Thus, D is the best answer here. As to the point about the differing principles, while the author of B does mention the unethical nature of lying, ultimately recants the position in the next sentence.

Let me know if you have further questions.
 nyc431
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: Jun 15, 2021
|
#90749
That's helpful, thank you!
User avatar
 Lmf249
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Jul 25, 2022
|
#96348
I was between C and D for this question and ultimately chose C. I understand how D can be correct, as A applied the theme to the context of using falsehood to enhance a novel and B applied the theme to the creation of an autobiography. I ultimately selected C because of the opposing conclusions that A ultimately accepts lying as necessary/good in some contexts, whereas B concludes it's unethical but inescapable. Could someone break down the decision-making process for me? Thanks!
User avatar
 atierney
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 215
  • Joined: Jul 06, 2021
|
#96511
Hi,

Yes, even as stated in your post, I wouldn't say the arguments are in opposition. The idea is that sometimes lying is necessary, as both arguments conclude, and while B specifies lying's unethical nature, nothing in A's argument refutes this.

Let me know if you have further questions on this.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.