- Thu Aug 11, 2022 4:35 pm
#96688
Thank you, Adam! I noticed I made the same mistake on a different game so I was hoping to clarify before exam day on Saturday.
I wonder if the following thought process is correct. If I have the following conditional, which is the Contrapositive of rule 4: (NOT I1)--> H3 or H4, then to see if the sufficient condition is triggered, all I have to do is look at the entire game board and see if I is not in 1 AT ALL. So if I is in spots 1 and 3, we don't meet the sufficient condition since OVERALL I can see I is in 1, so this rule does not apply?
I wonder if the following thought process is correct. If I have the following conditional, which is the Contrapositive of rule 4: (NOT I1)--> H3 or H4, then to see if the sufficient condition is triggered, all I have to do is look at the entire game board and see if I is not in 1 AT ALL. So if I is in spots 1 and 3, we don't meet the sufficient condition since OVERALL I can see I is in 1, so this rule does not apply?