LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 g_lawyered
  • Posts: 213
  • Joined: Sep 14, 2020
|
#94932
Hi P.S.
After reading all explanations, I see how answer choice E is correct. Is the word "only" in the 1st sentence what makes this sentence to mean "but not both". See previous explanation:
"The first sentence creates a clear either/or-but-not-both dichotomy: acceptable theories are either rehabilitationist or retributivist, but not both."
This is something I missed and didn't diagram during my PT. I think this is 1 of the reasons why I couldn't pick answer E (I couldn't link conditional reasoning together).

I agree with @ Khodi7531 , I also picked answer choice D. What makes answer choice D incorrect?
Thanks in advance
User avatar
 kartikharit
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: May 24, 2022
|
#95489
only 2 types of theories can be acceptable may infer that one of them must be acceptable. if both aren't acceptable = NO crime theory is acceptable which is false, as far as I know, pl correct me if I'm wrong.
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1419
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#95518
I'll start with you, g-lawyered.

We have an either/or but not both situation here because the stimulus uses language in that first sentence to indicate that the theory can only have one purpose. Retributivst theories are "simply" to punish. There's no more to them than that. We can't give them an additional purpose. They are ONLY there to punish. Rehabilitative theories are about reforming. Reforming is not the same as punishing and would be something other than retributivist.

Answer choice (D) is not supported because we can't look beyond rehabilitative and retributivist theories to draw a conclusion about ALL criminal theories. We can only draw conclusions based on the information we have in the stimulus. We can't extend to all criminal theories.

And kartikharit, it's not the case that any theory has to be acceptable. It's just the case that any acceptable theories have to fit into one of these categories. Saying something can exist is not the same as saying it must exist. If I say that any acceptable movie I can go to must be a comedy or a musical, I am not saying that I'm definitely going to a movie. I'm just saying if I do, it's acceptable if it's one of those two. Similarly here, we have no idea if there are any acceptable criminal theories.

Hope that helps!
 g_lawyered
  • Posts: 213
  • Joined: Sep 14, 2020
|
#96131
Hi Racheal!
Thanks for clarifying that up.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.