LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#37055
Please post below with any questions!
 abrown
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Nov 19, 2017
|
#41733
I got stuck with two answers, B & E and could not deduce any further. Can someone please explain why E is wrong?
 nicholaspavic
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 271
  • Joined: Jun 12, 2017
|
#41825
Hi abrown,

So here, we have a main point style question and that means our answer choice is going to have to accurately summarize the author's point of view. With this in mind, that first sentence is a very good conclusion restated in a very conditional way in Answer Choice B, which is correct. The reason why Answer Option (E) is incorrect is that it is merely restating a counter-premise offered in the stimulus. You know it's a counter-premise because of the indicator word "yet."

Thanks for the great question and I hope this helps!
 OneSeventy2019
  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: Sep 09, 2019
|
#73847
PowerScore,

I correctly chose choice B but am curious about the breakdown of this argument:

Sentence 1: "A good movie.....to his or her taste" :arrow: Conclusion
Sentence 2: "Because movie reviewers...those of most moviegoers" :arrow: premise (directly supporting conclusion)
Sentence 3: "Yet the function...better appreciate movies" :arrow: counter-premise

Does this look about right? Could the second sentence just be a standalone claim?

Thanks!
 James Finch
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 943
  • Joined: Sep 06, 2017
|
#73855
Hi One Seventy,

That last two sentences are actually both premises for the first sentence. I find paraphrasing individual sentences or even clauses in longer sentences can help understand the role they play in an argument. So the way I paraphrased this stimulus would be:

Sentence 1: Good movie reviewers must be able to be objective, not just subjective, when giving favorable reviews.

Sentence 2: Movie reviewers have different subjective tastes than most moviegoers.

Sentence 3: Movie reviewers sole function is to objectively help other moviegoers determine which movies to see.

The last two sentences combine to support the first one, and both are necessary to it; we have to know that movie reviewers have different tastes than most people, and that their function is to tell those other people which movies to see. Combine those two ideas and we see that in order to fulfill their function, they must give good reviews to movies that don't suit their tastes.

Hope this helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.