#17 - When expert witnesses give testimony, jurors often do

[Administrator]

Please post below with any questions!

[brcibake]

What is the reasoning behind this answer. I thought it was B and I am not sure were I went wrong.

[nicholaspavic]

Hi brci,

The correct answer is Answer (B):

"Jury decisions in cases involving expert witness testimonies are not always determined by the reliability of those testimonies."

This answer choice for this Must Be True question passes the Fact Test and it therefore the right answer. I hope this was good news!

[emilyjmyer]

Hi!

Why is the answer B and not C?

I realized that the words "not always" made for an attractive MBT answer choice but I still went with C.

I chose C because in the stimulus it describes

experts give testimony --> jurors don't understand technical info --> can't evaluate info

I thought C was a contrapositive: Jurors can evaluate info--> jurors do understand technical info

Where did I go wrong here?

Thanks!

[Robert Carroll]

emilyjmyer,

Answer choice (C) doesn't talk about understanding the information. It talks about assessing the legal implications, which is not discussed in the stimulus.

Additionally, it looks like what you diagramming shows answer choice (C) to be closer to a Mistaken Negation than anything else. Your diagram of the stimulus has "not understanding" and "not evaluate" as separate conditions. So in answer choice (C), the sufficient condition would be "understand" anyway. Your diagram of answer choice (C) doesn't match the conditionality of it anyway. Hope this helps!

Robert Carroll