- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sep 18, 2022
- Tue Dec 27, 2022 8:46 am
#98642
Hi Besties!
So, I'm currently planning to write in January and I'm looking for some strategies to improve on LR, where I consistently miss 6-8 questions. For reference I have accommodations and I am studying using a modified, three-section test where each section is double time. (So I have never failed to finish a section on time, or had to guess on like the last five.)
Here's where I *think* I'm struggling:
I had taken PT 84's LR section II as a drill, under timed conditions. I got 18 out of 25 on the section, and I had missed all of the lower percentage problems (an evaluation, weaken, and flaw questions) and I had flagged all of them. I also missed a 53% Flaw question I had not flagged, along with a point at issue, resolve, and weaken questions. (These all had higher percentages)
So, I think I need to drill questions such as Flaw at all difficulties, weaken questions, and point at issue questions as well.
But I'm honestly not sure if I am going about this correctly. Should I review it more thoroughly? Should I do what's been recommended for a plateau-like going over method questions?
So, I'm currently planning to write in January and I'm looking for some strategies to improve on LR, where I consistently miss 6-8 questions. For reference I have accommodations and I am studying using a modified, three-section test where each section is double time. (So I have never failed to finish a section on time, or had to guess on like the last five.)
Here's where I *think* I'm struggling:
I had taken PT 84's LR section II as a drill, under timed conditions. I got 18 out of 25 on the section, and I had missed all of the lower percentage problems (an evaluation, weaken, and flaw questions) and I had flagged all of them. I also missed a 53% Flaw question I had not flagged, along with a point at issue, resolve, and weaken questions. (These all had higher percentages)
So, I think I need to drill questions such as Flaw at all difficulties, weaken questions, and point at issue questions as well.
But I'm honestly not sure if I am going about this correctly. Should I review it more thoroughly? Should I do what's been recommended for a plateau-like going over method questions?