#8 - Philosopher: It has been argued that because particular

[Administrator]

Please post below with any questions!

[LSAT99.9]

Hello,

Why is E incorrect? My logic was this: the argument states that certain moral attitudes are shared across cultures and then uses an analogy showing how certain universal tastes can suit the needs of many different cultures. Therefore, why is it incorrect to draw the idea that moral attitudes (some of which are universal) can be adapted to suit the codes of many different cultures? Wouldn't this also show that morality can be grounded in some universal human nature since the moral attitudes on which the different moral codes are based are universal moral attitudes ?

Thank you.

[Zierra28]

Was the answer C because the Universal tastes (saltiness/sweetness) are, per the analogy, the BASE and equal to Moral attitudes (unfairness/cruelty), and C is basically saying that MA's provide the BASE for MCs (moral codes)?

[Claire Horan]

C is the best answer. Just as sweetness and saltiness are the basis of many different cuisines, shared moral attitudes provide the basis for many different moral codes. Note the parallels: both include the idea of a basis or grounding, both talk about universal ingredients giving rise to variety.

Zierra28, you are exactly right. E is not a good answer because it indicates that the moral codes of different countries are pre-existing, rather than that they arise from certain universal moral attitudes. E was a good contender, but the case of ending up with two contenders, you may need to refine and narrow your understanding of the analogy until you can eliminate all but one.