LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 tomoko
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Mar 19, 2012
|
#3842
Question 21: Buying scalped tckets is the only way for Jim to get into the concert.

I understand that in this sentence, "only" does not indicate a necessary condition (NC), it only modifies "way".

My question is how do you know which part of the sentence becomes a sufficient conditon (SC)? I put S (buying scalped tikets) -> JC (Jim gets into concert).

I am little confused which part of the sentence beome SC or NC without the indicators (2-7) in a sentence.

Is there any way for me to know which part of the sentence becomes SC or NC without indicators present in the sentence?
 Nikki Siclunov
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1362
  • Joined: Aug 02, 2011
|
#3845
Thanks for your question. The word "only" always indicates a necessary condition, and the example you bring up is no exception. Yes, "only" refers to "way," which in turn refers to "buying scalped tickets" (buying scalped tickets is the only way).

Your representation of the conditional relationship implies that if Jim buys scalped tickets, he will get into the concert. This is clearly a false inference: just because there is only one way to accomplish a particular goal does not mean that this one way is guaranteed to accomplish it. However, since buying scalped tickets is the only way to get into the concert, we do know that if Jim does get in, he must have bought such tickets.

Sometimes, it is helpful to think about the inherent meaning of the statement and conceptualize the distinction between sufficient and necessary conditions in terms dependence. The sufficient condition depends on the necessary condition, but not the other way around. In the example you mentioned, getting into the concert depends on buying scalped tickets, which is why "buying scalped tickets" is a necessary condition, and the remainder - a sufficient condition.

Hope this helps!
 tomoko
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Mar 19, 2012
|
#3853
Thank you, Nikki, for your help.

In the future, I'll try to put "If.. then" sentence as you did for my example. That was very helpful explanation!
 hl205136
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2017
|
#40781
I have been doing these drills and I constantly mix up sufficient and necessary.
The thinking I keep having is: If [blank] then [blank]. I do not believe this is correct.
In different words in the book, how do I identify what is sufficient and what is necessary?
Also in different words can you define a sufficient and necessary condition?
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5850
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#40837
hl205136 wrote:I have been doing these drills and I constantly mix up sufficient and necessary.
The thinking I keep having is: If [blank] then [blank]. I do not believe this is correct.
In different words in the book, how do I identify what is sufficient and what is necessary?
Also in different words can you define a sufficient and necessary condition?
Hi HL,

This is a topic that has come up hundreds of times before on this Forum, so fortunately we have had a chance to write about it frequently. So, I'm going to start by referring you to some prior discussions of conditional reasoning, including an analysis of intuition vs technical knowledge:

This is just a small selection of the items we've published on this topic, so I encourage you to go beyond these and explore even more. I frequently write about conditional reasoning since it's so prevalent on the LSAT, so if you search my posts you can find me talking about it quite a bit.

Please let me know if that helps. Thanks!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.