LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8916
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#80204
Complete Question Explanation

The correct answer choice is (E).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B):

Answer choice (C):

Answer choice (D):

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice.


This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
 Sdaoud17
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: Apr 13, 2013
|
#9122
Just to confirm E is Better than A because A is taking about the 5th Paragraph?

Thank you
 Steve Stein
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1153
  • Joined: Apr 11, 2011
|
#9135
Thanks for your question.

In that one, the author uses the last sentence to discuss the ethical issue with genetic engineers' potentially gaining the power to engineer humans for specific roles. Correct answer choice E discusses this illustration of sociopolitical ramifications. Incorrect answer choice A discusses medical dangers associated with rDNA technology.

I hope that's helpful! Let me know--thanks!

~Steve
 Sdaoud17
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: Apr 13, 2013
|
#9142
Thank you for confirming that C wrong is because " medical dangers associated with rDNA technology. " would you mind confirm that A is wrong because A is taking about the 5th Paragraph not the last. is that correct ?


Thank you
 Steve Stein
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1153
  • Joined: Apr 11, 2011
|
#9148
The author uses the last sentence to discuss the ethical issue with genetic engineers' potentially gaining the power to engineer humans for specific roles. Correct answer choice E discusses this illustration of sociopolitical ramifications. Incorrect answer choice A discusses medical dangers associated with rDNA technology. The fifth paragraph is described by answer choice C--more about upsetting the balance of nature than about medical concerns per se.

I hope that's helpful! Let me know--thanks!

~Steve
 Sdaoud17
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: Apr 13, 2013
|
#9149
Yes thank you
 ashleys13
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Jul 30, 2018
|
#48981
Hi! I was able to narrow these choices down to C and E but ended up choosing C because I thought the "sociopolitical ramifications" referenced weren't as important as the imbalance of nature/genetic engineering, etc. But as I'm reading the last sentence through again, is E correct because the last sentences includes literally a synonym of ramifications - "implications of such power" AND specifically references "genetic engineers... tinkering with human genes."? Thanks!!
 James Finch
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 943
  • Joined: Sep 06, 2017
|
#49071
Hi Ashley,

Exactly right! The difference between answer choices (C) and (E) are that (E) contains a synonymous term for the "ramifications" mentioned, while (C) deals with a broader idea ("upsetting the balance of nature" vs. "genetic engineering") that is beyond the scope of the text; "upsetting the balance of nature" could potentially refer to almost any type of human activity, from deforestation to building vehicles, and is far beyond the more specific issues surrounding genetic engineering discussed in the passage. So (C) ends up only being half-right, while (E) is completely within the scope needed to answer the question.

Good job!
User avatar
 SGD2021
  • Posts: 72
  • Joined: Nov 01, 2021
|
#95111
I'm still having a hard time eliminating C because the last paragraph does say "it gives scientists the power to instantly cross evolutionary and species boundaries that nature took millennia to establish." It seems to me the main reason I would eliminate C is because it reflects too much author's attitude by saying "WARN of the possible disasters..." which seems too strong since the author doesn't really warn since he's not very present. Would it be a good reason to eliminate C because it presents author's attitude that is too strong?
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1787
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#95203
SGD2021,

The author's attitude is in that sentence, so that's not the reason answer choice (C) is incorrect. The last sentence is not repeating the sentence before it, but going beyond it - the implications would be PARTICULARLY profound if...and then there's another consequence, different from the one in the previous sentence. If you think answer choice (C) is a good description of the sentence before the last one, that's exactly why answer choice (C) would be incorrect - we're trying to explain the purpose of the last sentence of the passage, which is different.

Robert Carroll

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.