to the top

#1 - Editorial: Clearly, during the past two years, the

PowerScore Staff
PowerScore Staff
Posts: 6670
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:19 pm
Points: 3,343

Complete Question Explanation

Flaw in the Reasoning-#%. The correct answer choice is (C)

This editorial makes the following questionable argument:

Premise: The number of unemployed who are actively seeking jobs has decreased.

Conclusion: The unemployment situation has been improving,

The problem is of course that maybe the decreasing number of job-seekers is based on the fact that many unemployed have given up.

Answer choice (A): The stimulus doesn't reference the government at all, so this answer choice cannot reflect the flaw in the stimulus.

Answer choice (B): There is no basis for the assertion that a two-year period is too short, so this cannot be the flaw that we seek.

Answer choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. The editorialist bases an optimistic conclusion on the fact that fewer people are still in search of jobs.

Answer choice (D): This answer choice is incorrect for the same reason that answer choice (A) is incorrect—the editorial doesn't refer to the government, directly or indirectly.

Answer choice (E): It is not a flaw to ignore other indicators—the author bases a simple (though flawed) conclusion on a basic premise about one indicator statistic. Since this answer choice does not describe a flaw, it is incorrect.